almost
- reynoldbot
- Posts: 208
- Joined: November 30th, 2009, 5:38 am
- Location: Minneapolis
almost
I was at southpaw today getting my Roscoe appraised when I spotted a beautiful lefty Ric 4003 in natural. They offered to trade my Roscoe plus $1,200 for it. I didn't have the money so I had to pass. But boy, was that a beautiful instrument. Definitely hard to say no.
Re: almost
Do you mean $1200 from you, or they'd give you $1200?
Re: almost
Yes, that's what I'm curious about too. If it really was a 4003, and not a highly sought-after pre-1972 4001 or anything, I don't think the price would have to be that far above the trade value of your Roscoe
And FYI, Ric fanatics never speak of 'natural' finishes
. They call it Mapleglo 
And FYI, Ric fanatics never speak of 'natural' finishes
Re: almost
Huh! I'd have asked for the $1200, not the other way around.
- reynoldbot
- Posts: 208
- Joined: November 30th, 2009, 5:38 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: almost
Well, I'm not a Ric fanatic, so I will still call it "natural"
They wanted $1,200 on top of it. My Roscoe is from 2002 and is a bit worn, whereas the Ric was in perfect shape. They put the value of my Roscoe in the $2,000-$2,500 ballpark. If it had been I direct trade, I probably would have taken it.
They wanted $1,200 on top of it. My Roscoe is from 2002 and is a bit worn, whereas the Ric was in perfect shape. They put the value of my Roscoe in the $2,000-$2,500 ballpark. If it had been I direct trade, I probably would have taken it.
Re: almost
So they valued the Ric over $3,000? Personally that trade seems offensive to me, that's a serious price gouge on Southpaw's part. Not cool.reynoldbot wrote:Well, I'm not a Ric fanatic, so I will still call it "natural"![]()
They wanted $1,200 on top of it. My Roscoe is from 2002 and is a bit worn, whereas the Ric was in perfect shape. They put the value of my Roscoe in the $2,000-$2,500 ballpark. If it had been I direct trade, I probably would have taken it.
Unless your Roscoe is seriously trashed (which it isn't), I don't see any way that a Roscoe for a new Rick 4003 is anything beyond a straight trade.
Re: almost
+1. If you really want a Rick, then sell your Roscoe and buy one for roughly the same price. Only make sure you don't buy it from Southpaw.andrew wrote:reynoldbot wrote:Unless your Roscoe is seriously trashed (which it isn't), I don't see any way that a Roscoe for a new Rick 4003 is anything beyond a straight trade.
Re: almost
WOW.
I would have laughed in their face.
I've worked at several music stores, including Guitar Center, and I can guarantee they're trying to gouge you.
Look at it like this... markups on used gear at music stores is generally 100%. So, you can guess that a dealer has 50% of any used item's selling price invested in the item (e.g., a $100 used amp ended up costing them $50). The same goes with pawn shops.
If they're putting the "value" of your Roscoe at $2000-$2500, then they're probably "giving" you half of the low end of that for a trade-in value. So you'd be getting $1000 credit.
If they're going to charge you an extra $1200 on top of that credit for the Ric, then then they're valuing the Ric at $2400... if they're valuing it at $2400, then they probably have half of that into it... so $1250.
So, basically, they're then going to charge you $1200 cash and break even on the Ric, take your Roscoe, and then sell it for $2500... and that will be almost pure profit, because they essentially only have $50 invested in it.
I hope that makes sense... and everyone should be aware of how that works, because trading in an instrument on ANYTHING is a HORRIBLE idea, and I used to see it ALL of the time.
I would have laughed in their face.
I've worked at several music stores, including Guitar Center, and I can guarantee they're trying to gouge you.
Look at it like this... markups on used gear at music stores is generally 100%. So, you can guess that a dealer has 50% of any used item's selling price invested in the item (e.g., a $100 used amp ended up costing them $50). The same goes with pawn shops.
If they're putting the "value" of your Roscoe at $2000-$2500, then they're probably "giving" you half of the low end of that for a trade-in value. So you'd be getting $1000 credit.
If they're going to charge you an extra $1200 on top of that credit for the Ric, then then they're valuing the Ric at $2400... if they're valuing it at $2400, then they probably have half of that into it... so $1250.
So, basically, they're then going to charge you $1200 cash and break even on the Ric, take your Roscoe, and then sell it for $2500... and that will be almost pure profit, because they essentially only have $50 invested in it.
I hope that makes sense... and everyone should be aware of how that works, because trading in an instrument on ANYTHING is a HORRIBLE idea, and I used to see it ALL of the time.
F Bass BN5 • ZON Legacy Elite 5 • ZON Sonus Elite 5 Fretless • ZON Sonus BG5 • Fender Custom Shop '64 NOS Jazz • Fender Custom Shop '75 NOS Jazz • Fender ADE Precision • Music Man SR4
Re: almost
Addison,Addison wrote:WOW.
I would have laughed in their face.
I've worked at several music stores, including Guitar Center, and I can guarantee they're trying to gouge you.
Look at it like this... markups on used gear at music stores is generally 100%. So, you can guess that a dealer has 50% of any used item's selling price invested in the item (e.g., a $100 used amp ended up costing them $50). The same goes with pawn shops.
If they're putting the "value" of your Roscoe at $2000-$2500, then they're probably "giving" you half of the low end of that for a trade-in value. So you'd be getting $1000 credit.
If they're going to charge you an extra $1200 on top of that credit for the Ric, then then they're valuing the Ric at $2400... if they're valuing it at $2400, then they probably have half of that into it... so $1250.
So, basically, they're then going to charge you $1200 cash and break even on the Ric, take your Roscoe, and then sell it for $2500... and that will be almost pure profit, because they essentially only have $50 invested in it.
I hope that makes sense... and everyone should be aware of how that works, because trading in an instrument on ANYTHING is a HORRIBLE idea, and I used to see it ALL of the time.
that was a wonderful explanation of how a store makes a profit on used and trade-in gear. I'm going to burn that one into my brain-cells.
- reynoldbot
- Posts: 208
- Joined: November 30th, 2009, 5:38 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: almost
Thanks for the heads-up guys. I'm woefully unexperienced when it comes to these kinds of things. As I said, I was only really interested if it would be a straight trade. I guess some part of me knew anything else was a raw deal. Southpaw's never tried to gouge me like that before, but I guess that's the way the world works.
Re: almost
Rumor has it the southpaw is really struggling these days, and the recession is componding an already difficult situation.reynoldbot wrote:Thanks for the heads-up guys. I'm woefully unexperienced when it comes to these kinds of things. As I said, I was only really interested if it would be a straight trade. I guess some part of me knew anything else was a raw deal. Southpaw's never tried to gouge me like that before, but I guess that's the way the world works.
Re: almost
THIS. A mod should thumbtack this for all to see. Trading in instruments is like trading in a car.Addison wrote:I hope that makes sense... and everyone should be aware of how that works, because trading in an instrument on ANYTHING is a HORRIBLE idea, and I used to see it ALL of the time.
Re: almost
yup - and the root of why I don't take instruments in trade (with very rare exception) ... I don't want to be tagged as utilizing used car salesman tactics in my bass selling activities.
I recently had a very tempting trade offer (still kick it around in my head), but the only way to have made the deal work from a business perspective would have left me offering a near insulting trade-in value on the very collectable bass being offered as part of the trade
all the best,
R
I recently had a very tempting trade offer (still kick it around in my head), but the only way to have made the deal work from a business perspective would have left me offering a near insulting trade-in value on the very collectable bass being offered as part of the trade
all the best,
R
Moderator: Blueprinting and Bondo
Pickups: Honey Badger Pickups - Like Honey Badger Pickups on Facebook!
Basses: Regenerate Guitar Works - Like Regenerate Guitar Works on Facebook!
Pickups: Honey Badger Pickups - Like Honey Badger Pickups on Facebook!
Basses: Regenerate Guitar Works - Like Regenerate Guitar Works on Facebook!
Re: almost
Should have been more or less a straight swap, no Ric other than a rare Lefty 4002 should be that price.
Re: almost
That's very cool of you to keep that kind of integrity, even when you know there are people out there to be "had."Rodent wrote:yup - and the root of why I don't take instruments in trade (with very rare exception) ... I don't want to be tagged as utilizing used car salesman tactics in my bass selling activities.
The almighty dollar can make us do weird things.
I once saw an old lady bring a MINT Gretsch "Western" amp, complete with the original amp cover, into a store where an employee told her that "The store wouldn't be interested," wrote her a personal check for $40 and put it into the trunk of his car... he later sold it for over $4,500 on eBay.
I never said anything about it... was younger and naive when it happened...
But, on the other side of things, Greg from Rocket Music (click for link) will simply sell your bass for you and put 100% of the money towards your purchase. He will list it on eBay, take photos for you, and pay for shipping if it sells. Granted, your bass has to sell before you get the credit... but there are many people out there who feel a lot more comfortable purchasing from an established "e-tailer" with a storefront website, etc.
F Bass BN5 • ZON Legacy Elite 5 • ZON Sonus Elite 5 Fretless • ZON Sonus BG5 • Fender Custom Shop '64 NOS Jazz • Fender Custom Shop '75 NOS Jazz • Fender ADE Precision • Music Man SR4
Re: almost
Damn straight! And then I would tell them that an account of their pathetic business practices was going to be on the internet, especially on lefty-focused boards as soon as I could get to a computer!Addison wrote:WOW.
I would have laughed in their face.
!(*^%^%)%!!!
"Nothing is what is seems, but everything is exactly what it is." B. Banzai
Re: almost
Stores need to make a profit, they are not charities. That said, Southpaw prices have always been astronomical. I never understood why anyone shopped there. I once drove through Houston and considered for a brief second stopping by, but then my better judgment kicked in.
It's always better to sell things yourself.
It's always better to sell things yourself.
Re: almost
Making a solid profit is fine, and I don't think that anyone involved in this discussion has a problem with that.
However, purposely low-balling someone on a trade and attempting to take advantage of them during a weak moment of GAS is a shady practice that I don't approve of.
If you've ever been involved in any type of "traditional" sales training (think methods that were developed by door-to-door salesmen in the 50's), then you know what I'm talking about.
Pulling the wool over people's eyes has even spread across the board to new products... MSRP on products has become horribly overinflated in proportion to actual manufacturing costs, and with the current "standard" 50-60% or more in profit margins across all parties involved (manufacturers, to distributors, to dealers), a product that might cost $5 to manufacture winds up with an MSRP of $50. And that's a best-case scenario.
That's why I have so much respect for Mesa/Boogie, and that's why a lot of dealers hate them. Their MSRP is an ACTUAL MSRP. It's not an overinflated arbitrary "value" set by the people who made the thing... it's what the thing is actually worth based on reasonable profit margins added to overall manufacturing costs. I've seen dealer cost on M/B products and I've seen relative manufacturing costs too, and the profits to be made are frankly quite modest... but definitely fair.
The only reason why people get so upset that they can't get a "deal" on an M/B product is because they're trained to feel like they should be getting a deal, since they "feel" that way when they buy everything else. There's this imaginary room to move on the price everyone has become accustomed to. "Hey, look at that tuner!!! The MSRP is $99.99, but it's on sale for $49.99!!! I need to buy that thing!!! It's HALF OFF!!!"
Little do they know, dealer cost is $18 and manufacturing cost was $3. But as long as the customer feels good about the purchase, then everybody is happy, right?
Ok.... rant over.

However, purposely low-balling someone on a trade and attempting to take advantage of them during a weak moment of GAS is a shady practice that I don't approve of.
If you've ever been involved in any type of "traditional" sales training (think methods that were developed by door-to-door salesmen in the 50's), then you know what I'm talking about.
Pulling the wool over people's eyes has even spread across the board to new products... MSRP on products has become horribly overinflated in proportion to actual manufacturing costs, and with the current "standard" 50-60% or more in profit margins across all parties involved (manufacturers, to distributors, to dealers), a product that might cost $5 to manufacture winds up with an MSRP of $50. And that's a best-case scenario.
That's why I have so much respect for Mesa/Boogie, and that's why a lot of dealers hate them. Their MSRP is an ACTUAL MSRP. It's not an overinflated arbitrary "value" set by the people who made the thing... it's what the thing is actually worth based on reasonable profit margins added to overall manufacturing costs. I've seen dealer cost on M/B products and I've seen relative manufacturing costs too, and the profits to be made are frankly quite modest... but definitely fair.
The only reason why people get so upset that they can't get a "deal" on an M/B product is because they're trained to feel like they should be getting a deal, since they "feel" that way when they buy everything else. There's this imaginary room to move on the price everyone has become accustomed to. "Hey, look at that tuner!!! The MSRP is $99.99, but it's on sale for $49.99!!! I need to buy that thing!!! It's HALF OFF!!!"
Little do they know, dealer cost is $18 and manufacturing cost was $3. But as long as the customer feels good about the purchase, then everybody is happy, right?
Ok.... rant over.
F Bass BN5 • ZON Legacy Elite 5 • ZON Sonus Elite 5 Fretless • ZON Sonus BG5 • Fender Custom Shop '64 NOS Jazz • Fender Custom Shop '75 NOS Jazz • Fender ADE Precision • Music Man SR4
- Agent00Soul
- Posts: 904
- Joined: June 18th, 2009, 2:36 pm
- Location: Londinium
Re: almost
That story makes my blood boil!!Addison wrote:Rodent wrote:I once saw an old lady bring a MINT Gretsch "Western" amp, complete with the original amp cover, into a store where an employee told her that "The store wouldn't be interested," wrote her a personal check for $40 and put it into the trunk of his car... he later sold it for over $4,500 on eBay.
But - little old ladies aside - for the vast majority of us, to trade in anything in this day and age of Craigslist and Ebay is pretty unnecessary unless there is some kind of time constraint/chemical addiction involved. Even with negotiating prices in a private sale you still come out way ahead.