Rickenbacker 4003s

This is for showing off your collection of southpaw basses.
If you want to chat about a particular bass please start a new thread in the discussion forum. Let's keep this section all eye candy all the time.
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

New addition. I'm really happy with this one. The neck is true, and the redesigned bridge actually can be properly intonated. Of course it sounds amazing. That was never an issue (for me anyway) with RIC.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Jeroen
Posts: 2192
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Jeroen »

Congrats, that looks killer! I owned a regular 4003 but could never get along with the wonky ergonomics of the bound body edges and the rather square feeling neck. I bet I would feel much more at home on a new 4003s!
I love how lefties are still getting the deluxe hardcase instead of the regular one 8-)
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

Jeroen wrote:Congrats, that looks killer! I owned a regular 4003 but could never get along with the wonky ergonomics of the bound body edges and the rather square feeling neck. I bet I would feel much more at home on a new 4003s!
I love how lefties are still getting the deluxe hardcase instead of the regular one 8-)
The ergonomics are definitely better on this model, more like a Fender or what have you.
But the case- it must be called “deluxe” because of all the extra weight. It’s ridiculously heavy. Also, the case is actually too long for the bass. It slides around and you’d actually have to pack something at the end of the body or the headstock to make it a snug fit. That’s bad news, especially for an instrument with an angled headstock. The case looks cool and is super sturdy, but it’s still garbage.
User avatar
paulo
Posts: 3612
Joined: December 9th, 2014, 5:27 pm
Location: Beantown

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by paulo »

Matt R. wrote:
Jeroen wrote:Congrats, that looks killer! I owned a regular 4003 but could never get along with the wonky ergonomics of the bound body edges and the rather square feeling neck. I bet I would feel much more at home on a new 4003s!
I love how lefties are still getting the deluxe hardcase instead of the regular one 8-)
The ergonomics are definitely better on this model, more like a Fender or what have you.
But the case- it must be called “deluxe” because of all the extra weight. It’s ridiculously heavy. Also, the case is actually too long for the bass. It slides around and you’d actually have to pack something at the end of the body or the headstock to make it a snug fit. That’s bad news, especially for an instrument with an angled headstock. The case looks cool and is super sturdy, but it’s still garbage.
Congrats!
That looks awesome!
Here's something that may help it fit snug into the case:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/HQ-ISSUE-Rifle ... 1198.m1985
User avatar
NoXX
Posts: 1078
Joined: April 6th, 2010, 12:24 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by NoXX »

Wow- looks great Matt! Another killer addition to your stable. Is it time for a 2021 bass family portrait of your collection? I’ve lost track of the awesomeness :D
In the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful...
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

NoXX wrote:Wow- looks great Matt! Another killer addition to your stable. Is it time for a 2021 bass family portrait of your collection? I’ve lost track of the awesomeness :D

Ha, i can do that.
ch willie
Posts: 426
Joined: February 22nd, 2017, 5:58 pm

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by ch willie »

O so wonderful!
User avatar
superheavydeathmetal
Posts: 1282
Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Location: Cincinnati

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by superheavydeathmetal »

That's awesome, man! Congratulations! I love Ricks! I keep going back and forth about whether I prefer the 4003 or the 4003S. Either way, I definitely prefer stereo.

If you don't like the backward-wired pots and don't feel like fixing it yourself, Aceonbass on TalkBass makes wiring harnesses for Ricks. He uses optimized pot and capacitor values as well, and can also include the push/pull "vintage/modern" switch like the new Ricks have.

For those who may not know, that switch turns on/off a capacitor (C3) that is in series with the bridge pickup that the early Ricks had.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

superheavydeathmetal wrote:That's awesome, man! Congratulations! I love Ricks! I keep going back and forth about whether I prefer the 4003 or the 4003S. Either way, I definitely prefer stereo.

If you don't like the backward-wired pots and don't feel like fixing it yourself, Aceonbass on TalkBass makes wiring harnesses for Ricks. He uses optimized pot and capacitor values as well, and can also include the push/pull "vintage/modern" switch like the new Ricks have.

For those who may not know, that switch turns on/off a capacitor (C3) that is in series with the bridge pickup that the early Ricks had.

Strangely enough, they didn’t wire mine backwards. It has lefty pots and they have taper.
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

I couldn’t resist emailing the guy for a quote though. Ha
User avatar
superheavydeathmetal
Posts: 1282
Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Location: Cincinnati

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by superheavydeathmetal »

Matt R. wrote:Strangely enough, they didn’t wire mine backwards. It has lefty pots and they have taper.
That's awesome! Good on RIC! There are a lot of medium/high-end manufacturers who don't do that.
Matt R. wrote:I couldn’t resist emailing the guy for a quote though. Ha
Nice! I have one of his harnesses in one of my Ricks, and I am very happy with it.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

He was saying that some basses don’t have quite a deep enough control cavity and may have to be hit with a dremel. Did you have that issue with yours? And what model is your RIC?
User avatar
AzWhoFan
Posts: 2866
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:57 am

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by AzWhoFan »

I wonder if the silver cases got a re-design? My 20 year old 4003V63 fits as snug as a bug in a rug in its' silver case.
User avatar
AzWhoFan
Posts: 2866
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:57 am

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by AzWhoFan »

And lefty pots/harness is quite a surprise! That doesn't fit with John Hall's philosophy of 'we've been building them this way for 40 years'.
User avatar
superheavydeathmetal
Posts: 1282
Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Location: Cincinnati

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by superheavydeathmetal »

I put an Aceonbass harness in a 4001V63, and it went right in with no issues! This was several years ago. He may use different pots, now.
Gilmourisgod wrote:I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

AzWhoFan wrote:And lefty pots/harness is quite a surprise! That doesn't fit with John Hall's philosophy of 'we've been building them this way for 40 years'.

There’s definitely *some* taper, so I assume they are lefty (and it’s counterclockwise to turn up). There’s a point near the end that they will just sort of switch off so they aren’t perfect.
But I’m gonna do one of these new harnesses anyway. The selector switch is a tad weird.
Wouldn’t be a RIC if you didn’t have to do a bunch of shit to it to make it perfect.
User avatar
tim
Posts: 2978
Joined: August 1st, 2015, 6:36 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by tim »

Man, that's awesome. My Ric curiosity is coming back. Not GASy enough for the price, but it kinda makes me wish I'd hung on to the one I had a little longer. Eh, maybe someday...
User avatar
Matt R.
Posts: 3967
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Matt R. »

tim wrote:Man, that's awesome. My Ric curiosity is coming back. Not GASy enough for the price, but it kinda makes me wish I'd hung on to the one I had a little longer. Eh, maybe someday...

Act on that curiosity ASAP. But just make sure you buy from a dealer and it has warranty and a return policy.

Side note- this bass has rekindled my love for heavier gauge strings.
dwibass
Posts: 34
Joined: April 6th, 2020, 6:16 am

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by dwibass »

Who doesn't love Ric's? Seems like a lot of lefties have them in their stables, the new bridge looks great. Congrats Matt, gorgeous instrument!
User avatar
Jeroen
Posts: 2192
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 1:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Rickenbacker 4003s

Post by Jeroen »

Matt R. wrote:Side note- this bass has rekindled my love for heavier gauge strings.
33.25" scale may have something to do with that :)
Post Reply